Archive for November, 2008

World Usability Day is here–have a cookie!

For the first time since I became a usability evangelist, I’m not presenting anything to anyone in honor of World Usability Day, with Usability cookies as treats for those who attend. The Usability cookies were awesome–we had one of my friends who runs QT Cakes make sugar cookies–and on each frosted cookie was written one of the six components of usability:

  • Effective
  • Efficient
  • Learnable
  • Memorable
  • Error-free
  • Easy (or was it “Satisfied”? I wish we’d taken pictures before we ate them!)

It was always entertaining to watch which cookie each person would pick. But when you work from home, how do you pass out cookies to your colleagues? 

So … What is usability?

Usability is not just about “ease of use”, although that is an important element of it. Usability really evaluates all the components on the cookies:

  • Effective: Can the user complete the tasks the tool or web site is intended for? For an e-commerce web site, can the users actually purchase something on the site? For an informational web site, can the user find the answers to their question? For a cellular phone, can the user make a phone call? These sound like no-brainers, but you’d be surprised how often you encounter an e-commerce web site that has one or more barriers to completing a purchase. You can also measure supplemental tasks, like can the user schedule an appointment on their phone or change the ring tone? Or for an e-commerce web site, can the user find the product specifications? If you suspect the user might have difficulty with some tasks, make sure you test those, but also test tasks you think are very straightforward–you’d be surprised what you’ll learn.
  • Efficient: How long does it take users to complete their task? Even if the user can make a purchase on the site, if it takes 30 minutes for them to complete their purchase (and I’ve seen this happen in a real usability test of a real web site!), how likely is it that they’re going to buy? You need to make your software/website/tool in such a way that the user feels like they breezed through it. Notice that I said “the user feels like”–it really isn’t that important what the measured time was. What’s more important is whether the users feel like it went fast (or waaaay too slow). User perception is key.
  • Learnable: Can an inexperienced user who has never seen this before figure out how to use it? How long does it take them to figure it out? Do they have any misperceptions about how it should work? If you see any of that, it’s a problem with the affordance of your software/website/tool. Affordance is a user’s expectation of how something should work. Users expect something that looks like a button to be clickable. A doorknob turns to open the door. Blue underlined text is expected to be clickable. The Help button (or link) is expected in the upper right portion of the screen. If a system follows expected conventions, it’s more likely that the user can learn how to use it fairly quickly. Learnability is more than just following conventions, though. It has to do with placing things consistently, following the user’s regular workflow, and sometimes thinking outside the box. Some of the easiest things to use (take the iPhone, for example) didn’t follow convention.
  • Memorable: Can a user walk away from it and return a month later and still remember how to use it? Do they remember where to find everything–or do they have to go through a re-learning process? Memorability is especially important for applications that are used infrequently (such as, say, an e-commerce web site).
  • Error-free: No system is completely error-free, but is the system fraught with bugs? That will cause a frustrating user experience and reflect badly on your company. Also, what happens when a user encounters a problem? Does the system offer the user a solution to fix the problem, or leave the user without any option but to give up? How are error messages phrased? Do they blame the user, or the system? No user wants to be blamed, but systems have no feelings, so why do we so often encounter error messages that blame the user?  Even if it WAS the user’s fault, there’s no point in making an issue of it. Hey, they’re human! Humans make mistakes. Be kind and forgiving to your users and they will appreciate that (and buy more from you).
  • Easy and satisfying: A system should not just be easy to use, but also pleasant. The user should feel they accomplished something and have a sense of pride and satisfaction once they’ve completed their task. Many systems leave their users battered and frustrated both with themselves and the system. Users have a tendency to blame themselves so an unusable system can wear down their sense of self worth.

For more thoughts on usability, here are some recommended resources for you:

What else can you do on World Usability Day?

Recommendations from the World Usability Day web site.

Advertisements

World Usability Day is coming up!

World Usability Day is an annual event that celebrates and educates people on usability all over the world. There are over 225 events planned this year.

As they say on the World Usability Day site:

“It’s about making our world work better.
It’s about “Making Life Easy” and user friendly.

Technology today is too hard to use. A cell phone should be as easy to access as a doorknob.
In order to humanize a world that uses technology as an infrastructure for education, healthcare, transportation, government, communication, entertainment, work and other areas, we must develop these technologies in a way that serves people first…”

This year, the theme is transportation, and they’ve even put a bit of a green spin on it.

So in honor of that, I’m going to share a couple of my all-time favorite transportation-related usability “bloopers”:

Cup holder too close to the stick shift Street names are almost identical.

And this one is my all-time favorite!

Should I get out of the car or not?

How usable was YOUR voting experience?

Mine was pretty good–we had a fill-in-the-dots-style ballot, so it was very easy to interpret and complete. I was done voting in just a few minutes. The lines weren’t bad either (but hey, we live in South Dakota, so there aren’t that many PEOPLE here!)

But I’ve heard mixed reviews on some other people’s voting experiences–some didn’t sound so good at all, and that concerns me. The one thing that needs to be absolutely crystal clear is how to vote.

How was your voting experience?

  • What did the ballot look like?
  • What actions were you supposed to take to indicate your vote?
  • Was it easy and straightforward or kind of confusing?

Please comment and let me know!

You can also see how people all over the nation are rating their voting experience on the map (and share your own!) at MyFairElection.com.

Election Results Map

I wanted to embed this map on my page, but WordPress doesn’t seem to want me to do that. Anyhow, here’s a Google Map that will show real-time updates on the election results. As of the time I’m writing this, results aren’t available yet, but they will be soon!

http://maps.google.com/help/maps/elections/#2008_election